← comparisons · head to head

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 scores higher than DeepSeek V4 Pro on both public leaderboards that rate them. On the ArtificialWatch Index, which takes the median of each model's percentile across the boards that score it, DeepSeek V4 Pro is at 19.9 and GLM-5.2 at 31.4 (out of 100). On each maker's API, DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $0.66 / $1.98 per 1M tokens (input / output) and GLM-5.2 $1.40 / $4.40.

Scores as published by each board; table composed November 7, 2026.

Get the next launch alert, free →

Leaderboard by leaderboard

BoardDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.2Higher
LMArena
Elo (community votes)
1,581.61,606.4GLM-5.2
SimpleBench
AVG@5 % (private set)
50.958.8GLM-5.2

Raw scores are each board's own scale, so compare within a row, not across rows. Full table: the bench index.

For coding

On the ArtificialWatch coding index, DeepSeek V4 Pro is at 40 (#27 of 45) and GLM-5.2 at 28.3 (#35). DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on 1 of the 2 coding boards that rate both and GLM-5.2 on 1.

Coding boardDeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.2
LMArena · Coding1,469.11,487.8
Vals Vibe Code Bench82.364

The full AI coding leaderboard →

DeepSeek V4 Pro at a glance

Developer
DeepSeek
Status
Live since April 24, 2026
API price
$0.66 input / $1.98 output per 1M tokens · DeepSeek, deepseek-v4-pro
Context window
1.05M tokens

Live · open weights · superseded by V4.1 Flash — per DeepSeek's own changelog rather than our own reading, deepseek-v4-flash routes to V4.1 Flash; the matching deepseek-v4-pro cutover set for 04:00 UTC Sep 14 was reversed on its eve and V4 Pro is still served at unchanged billing, which is search-grade too — but our own bench refresh still scored deepseek-v4-pro-0813 as a separate model on Sep 16 · our sweep read the bare deepseek-flash alias on Sep 10 at $0.15/$0.60 per 1M, 1M ctx.

DeepSeek V4-Pro lands at $0.435/$0.87 — and "model names remain unchanged" hides a 2.7x price fork

2026-08-13 · DeepSeek launched V4-Pro today on app, web and API. The headline features are agent upgrades, selectable reasoning effort across V4-Pro and V4-Flash, and native OpenAI Responses API support optimised for Codex. The line worth reading twice is the quiet one: "Model names remain unchanged."

Full DeepSeek V4 Pro tracker →

GLM-5.2 at a glance

Developer
Zhipu AI
Status
Live since June 16, 2026
API price
$1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens · Z.AI, glm-5.2
Context window
1M tokens

Live — $0.40/$2.52 per 1M · no longer the current shipped GLM: 5.3 landed Aug 14 and 5.3 Flash Aug 26.

Full GLM-5.2 tracker →

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2: quick answers

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM-5.2?

It depends on what you measure. GLM-5.2 scores higher than DeepSeek V4 Pro on both public leaderboards that rate them. GLM-5.2's widest lead is on LMArena. On the ArtificialWatch Index, which takes the median of each model's percentile across the boards that score it, DeepSeek V4 Pro is at 19.9 and GLM-5.2 at 31.4 (out of 100).

Which is newer, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2. It went live on June 16, 2026, 53 days after DeepSeek V4 Pro (April 24, 2026).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on both input and output. On each vendor's own API, DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 input / $1.98 output per million tokens and GLM-5.2 is $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens. Prices as published in the models.dev catalog, as of 2026-11-07.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro, at 1.05M tokens against GLM-5.2's 1M, as each vendor lists it.

How do DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM-5.2 compare for coding?

On the ArtificialWatch coding index, DeepSeek V4 Pro is at 40 (#27 of 45) and GLM-5.2 at 28.3 (#35). DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on 1 of the 2 coding boards that rate both and GLM-5.2 on 1.

Who makes DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM-5.2?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is from DeepSeek; GLM-5.2 is from Zhipu AI.

Where do these numbers come from?

Each score is the leaderboard's own published figure, read by ArtificialWatch (table composed November 7, 2026). Boards measure different things, so raw scores are only comparable within a row.

More comparisons

GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-5.6GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kimi K3Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3Qwen 3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 ProQwen 3.8 Max vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.8 Max vs GPT-5.6GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 5GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Fable 5GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5Grok 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Grok 4.6 vs GPT-5.6Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.5Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs GLM-5.3Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM-5.3 Flash vs GLM-5.3MiniMax M3 vs Kimi K3MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4 ProMiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2MiniMax M3 vs GPT-5.5GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3 vs Claude Opus 5GLM-5.3 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-5.6GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 SolClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Mistral Large 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3 FlashMuse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna
sweeping every 60 seconds

Hear when the next one drops. Free.

Free: a Chrome push and an email about 15 minutes after a new model answers on a public API. Members get a text or a phone call the moment a launch is confirmed.

  • Free forever
  • No card
  • Unsubscribe in one click

Want it the minute it answers? Try Signal 7 days free →

Also: the bench index · API pricing · what a workload costs on each · the wire