← comparisons · head to head

GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3

Of the 4 public leaderboards that rate both, GLM-5.3 scores higher on 2 and Kimi K3 on 2. On the ArtificialWatch Index, which takes the median of each model's percentile across the boards that score it, GLM-5.3 is at 48.1 and Kimi K3 at 38.5 (out of 100). On each maker's API, GLM-5.3 costs $1.40 / $4.40 per 1M tokens (input / output) and Kimi K3 $3 / $15.

Scores as published by each board; table composed November 10, 2026.

Get the next launch alert, free →

Leaderboard by leaderboard

BoardGLM-5.3Kimi K3Higher
LMArena
Elo (community votes)
1,622.21,657.1Kimi K3
SimpleBench
AVG@5 % (private set)
66.260.7GLM-5.3
Vals AI
Vals Index accuracy % · weighted finance + coding tasks
59.853GLM-5.3
Epoch AI
Epoch Capabilities Index (ECI) · many benchmarks on one scale
156.9158.5Kimi K3

Raw scores are each board's own scale, so compare within a row, not across rows. Full table: the bench index.

For coding

On the ArtificialWatch coding index, GLM-5.3 is at 51.5 (#20 of 47) and Kimi K3 at 65.3 (#16). Kimi K3 scores higher on both coding boards that rate them.

Coding boardGLM-5.3Kimi K3
LMArena · Coding1,4991,505.5
Vals Vibe Code Bench78.185

The full AI coding leaderboard →

GLM-5.3 at a glance

Developer
Zhipu AI
Status
Live since August 14, 2026
API price
$1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens · Z.AI, glm-5.3
Context window
1M tokens

Live - same 743B base as 5.2, every gain from post-training · tops CyberGym · open weights on Hugging Face (zai-org/GLM-5.3, 141 safetensors files, public when we read it Sep 25; repo created Aug 25) · Anthropic research (Sep 29): builds end-to-end exploits near Claude Mythos Preview's rate (ExploitBench 50 of 410 vs 56 of 410), and its safeguards fell to simple bypasses 64-100% of the time · Epoch AI report (Oct 29): built one-click file-reading exploits for all six Firefox releases Sep 17-Oct 26 from published-but-unshipped fixes, about $1,000 each, with no refusals at any provider.

Epoch AI: open-weight GLM 5.3 built working Firefox exploits from security fixes that had not shipped yet, for about $1,000 each

2026-10-30 · An open-weight model can now turn browser security fixes that are public but not yet shipped into working exploits on its own, according to a report Epoch AI published October 29.

Anthropic: open-weights GLM-5.3 nearly matches Claude Mythos Preview at building exploits, and its safeguards are easy to strip

2026-09-29 · Anthropic published research on September 29 testing Z.ai's GLM-5.3, an open-weights model anyone can download, on offensive cyber tasks. Its finding: GLM-5.3 can build working end-to-end exploits at close to the rate of Claude Mythos Preview, the model Anthropic released only to vetted defenders.

Full GLM-5.3 tracker →

Kimi K3 at a glance

Developer
Moonshot
Status
Live since July 15, 2026
API price
$3 input / $15 output per 1M tokens · Moonshot AI, kimi-k3
Context window
1.05M tokens

Live — dropped Jul 15 · 2.8T · open weights landed Jul 27 (1.56 TB, MXFP4).

Kimi K3, day one: impressive, expensive, and a little slow

2026-07-16 · Kimi K3 has been live for a day, and the picture forming is more interesting than the launch-night hype. Here's everything we're seeing so far.

Full Kimi K3 tracker →

GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3: quick answers

Which is better, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K3?

It depends on what you measure. Of the 4 public leaderboards that rate both, GLM-5.3 scores higher on 2 and Kimi K3 on 2. GLM-5.3's widest lead is on Vals AI; Kimi K3's widest lead is on LMArena. On the ArtificialWatch Index, which takes the median of each model's percentile across the boards that score it, GLM-5.3 is at 48.1 and Kimi K3 at 38.5 (out of 100).

Which is newer, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K3?

GLM-5.3. It went live on August 14, 2026, 30 days after Kimi K3 (July 15, 2026).

Which is cheaper, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K3?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper on both input and output. On each vendor's own API, GLM-5.3 is $1.40 input / $4.40 output per million tokens and Kimi K3 is $3 input / $15 output per million tokens. Prices as published in the models.dev catalog, as of 2026-11-10.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM-5.3 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3, at 1.05M tokens against GLM-5.3's 1M, as each vendor lists it.

How do GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3 compare for coding?

On the ArtificialWatch coding index, GLM-5.3 is at 51.5 (#20 of 47) and Kimi K3 at 65.3 (#16). Kimi K3 scores higher on both coding boards that rate them.

Who makes GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3?

GLM-5.3 is from Zhipu AI; Kimi K3 is from Moonshot.

Where do these numbers come from?

Each score is the leaderboard's own published figure, read by ArtificialWatch (table composed November 10, 2026). Boards measure different things, so raw scores are only comparable within a row.

More comparisons

GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-5.6GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Kimi K3Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs Claude Fable 5.1Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Fable 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs Kimi K3Qwen 3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 ProQwen 3.8 Max vs GLM-5.2Qwen 3.8 Max vs GPT-5.6GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 5GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5GLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.5Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Fable 5GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.2GLM-5.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.6 vs Claude Opus 5Grok 4.6 vs Claude Fable 5Grok 4.6 vs GPT-5.6Grok 4.6 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 ProGemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3GPT-6 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6 Sol vs Claude Opus 5GPT-6 Sol vs Claude Fable 5GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5GPT-5.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.5Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Claude Opus 5Qwen 3.8 Max vs GLM-5.3Qwen 3.8 Max vs Claude Opus 4.8GLM-5.3 Flash vs GLM-5.3MiniMax M3 vs Kimi K3MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4 ProMiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.2MiniMax M3 vs GPT-5.5GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3 vs Claude Opus 5GLM-5.3 vs Claude Fable 5Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMuse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.6Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-5.6GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 SolClaude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5Mistral Large 4 vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6 Luna vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3 FlashMuse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 AstraGemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Fable 5.1Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 AstraGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 SolGemini 4 Carbon vs Gemini 4 Argon
sweeping every 60 seconds

Hear when the next one drops. Free.

Free: a Chrome push and an email about 15 minutes after a new model answers on a public API. Members get a text or a phone call the moment a launch is confirmed.

  • Free forever
  • No card
  • Unsubscribe in one click

Want it the minute it answers? Try Signal 7 days free →

Also: the bench index · API pricing · what a workload costs on each · the wire